Well, just sent in my fresh new application for a scholarship. As usual, the proposed subject of research is cyclones (and other storms) - to determine how much their intensity, frequency and locations will change under various scenarios of climate change.
So, in a nutshell, that's:
1. Will storms get more frequent?
2. Will storms become more intense?
3. Will storms affect different areas?
And yes, I've included blatant references to Katrina, Rita, Vince and Wilma, as well as studies linking an increase in storminess to a warmer world.
I wonder if I could somehow have included references to tsunamis and earthquakes....nah can't think of a way :-)
For the above three questions wrt to hurricanes / cyclones, my opinions at the moment are : 1) Unknown, as warm temperatures aren't the key criteria - it's actually wind shear, tropical waves etc. 2) Probably. The most intense ones should be able to have more energy to feed off. 3) Probably. Warmer temperatures do help expand the area where cyclones can form, but the 26 degree isotherm is not a guarantee - see Vince this year, Aldonca/Catarina in the South Atlantic in 2004. However, if the geographical area is enlarged, then you might see an increase in storms (see question 1)
However, if warmer temperatures warm the upper atmosphere too, and/or cause an increase in wind shear...all bets are off.
So everyone, send good vibes this way (or rather, to a bundle of paper heading off on a plane). I want to do this with my life, dammit.
October 26 2005, 10:13:22 UTC 6 years ago
We've had gale force winds here for the past few days, which wrecked my hair yesterday. >_<
xx
Feef
October 26 2005, 19:40:24 UTC 6 years ago
:-)
October 26 2005, 15:21:05 UTC 6 years ago
October 26 2005, 19:42:51 UTC 6 years ago
In fact, the amount of heat humans generate is insignificant compared to the sun. What is not insignificant are things like CO2, CH4, dust, SO2, etc as they affect the radiation balance.
October 26 2005, 20:17:57 UTC 6 years ago
October 27 2005, 08:04:58 UTC 6 years ago
weather control
Jeremy - you can't fool me. You're just setting up preliminaries to make your own weather control machine and then unveil it on an unsuspecting world and demand .... oh, I dunno .... 100 trillion buckazoids from the world governments (hopefully this number is still meaningful w.r.t. inflation by the time you get there)In any case, please do tell me if you do get to predict major storms hitting things like ... oh ... oil production ... or financial centers ... or major cities ...
Lotsa money to be made in the right financial instruments, you know, like crude oil call options or stock index puts or building company calls...
Good luck with that application. :-)
October 27 2005, 08:36:23 UTC 6 years ago
Re: weather control
Hmph. To be able to forecast increasing (or decreasing) risks before the insurance people do, I'll need to build my models first. Which means, of course, that I need to study the damned things first.Maybe I shouldn't call it funding and instead couch it as an investment and offer, ooh, 50% of future earnings derived from cyclone-related risk issues?
50 trillion buckazoids has to be a better potential rate of return than the lottery. Interested? ;-)
October 28 2005, 23:14:59 UTC 6 years ago
Re: weather control
oh yeah, 50 trillion buckazoids is a great *potential* rate of return. Now, to get a real appreciation of what my investment will bring, I will need an estimate of how likely it is for the expected rate of return to materialize. For the lottery, I can figure out that, here in Sydney, a $2 lottery ticket has a 1 in about 11 million chance of winning the jackpot ... and that the jackpot occasionally rolls over and goes up to giddy heights of more than 10 million bucks ... so it's not surprising that I only buy them when the jackpot's in that price range (or better) ...What's your .... erm ... investment's likely payout? How much will this ... erm ... research of yours cost?
Btw, you'll have to work on your Dr. Evil act.